In this financial climate jobs have been decimated across almost every industry even those, which were traditionally immune like the law. In some ways comparing a struggling factory worker's job loss to that of a lawyer in a "white shoe" [read; conservative & elite] firm is like comparing "apples to oranges" but at the end of the day, a layoff is a layoff. This brings me to something that impressed me in an article in this past Sunday's New York Times. It was about White & Case a century old Wall Street firm that recently cut 200 lawyers off their payroll, both junior associates & partners alike. These days there's is nothing remarkable about a big company laying off employees. While much of the article was spent discussing whether or not this move represented a paradigm shift for the profession as a whole, what struck me was how they conducted the process.
Keeping The 'Face"
According to the chairman Hugh Verrier, they could have done one of 3 things:
- they could have done nothing [considered unhealthy for the firm's survival]
- they could have dissembled alleging poor performance
- they could tell the truth; basically they could no longer afford the larger staff
While the first option clearly sounded like a death knell for the firm, there are many companies today that opt for "plan B:" asserting the reason is poor performance or [gasp] some other malfeasance. What's the difference between alleging poor performance/malfeasance & the truth? Aside from the fact that it would be untrue, it therefore also opens them up to legal liability. However doing what White & Case opted for generally puts the company on the hook for more money [especially at the partner level]. What their choice did NOT do was destroy their employees' "face," their professional & personal prestige. Instead White & Case decided to be candid & reveal that as a firm, that they were ill prepared for a financial downturn, a move that tarnishes their brand further. As a result, their employees "only" had to deal with the layoff & could at least take [cold?] comfort in their ability to market their skills elsewhere with the general expectation of supportive references. A difficult task but done in a cleaner & far more ethical manner. Now if only they could take "ethics" to the bank...